Scroll down to bottom of page to see state Chapter websites as they become available.
How do we prevent homosexual morality’s USA becoming an ancient Greek man-boy culture of sex? By John P. Roco January 17, 2012 @ 9:35 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time Oahu, Hawaii
The gay agenda is pervasive; ‘it is everywhere:’ Brokeback Mountain, La Cage aux Follett, Log Cabin ‘republicans,’ democratic party powerhouses, numerous library books- all seemingly unstoppable. It is almost as if Kinsey, who wanted to ‘push the envelope,’ won- with his ‘observations’ of sexual behavior of his college students, and in depth interviews of homosexual pedophiles. Kinsey is the one who came up with the continuum of sexual preference from gay to straight- seemingly through his intense observations of the results of sexual abuse on male minors by his pedophiles.
But how do we stop this immorality?
This nation, the USA, was built with references to our Creator as well as emphasis on the rights of the individual. But at what point do the rights of gays and homosexuals to ‘pursue happiness,’ cross the line of forcing all of us ‘into the fulcrum’ of their world. Already gays and homosexuals boast of obtaining access to all of the unwanted foster, adoptive children. ‘Own all of the nation’s orphans’ is already a mantra. Of course, if it was, ‘babysit all of the children,’ and all childcare facilities were required to have gay men on staff to ‘expose children to a healthy non-discriminatory environment,’ we would all be up in arms. Right now, though, with HR 1681 and S 1770, ‘Every Child Deserves a Family Act,’ the end result would be that no foster or adoptive child could choose to go to a non-gay or non-homosexual home.
The gay agenda is organized.
Just google ‘log cabin republicans;’ in fact, in their ‘split and divide’ policy, they have won. What just 25 years ago were the ‘Reagan conservatives’ is now totally split. Are you a ‘fiscal conservative?’ Oh, I was looking for a ‘social conservative.’ Before, there was no differentiation. The ‘Log Cabin Republicans’ produced this differentiation by forming themselves, then wanting to be ‘added on’ to events; they also from radio self-reports of their own activities, would join republican parties ‘incognito’ spreading their lore. When I heard the terminology ‘religious extremists’ in my republican party referring to those who were ‘social conservatives,’ I knew something was amiss. That, my friends, was direct infiltration.
What do we do?
Obviously we are civilized, unlike some other religious groups that demand ‘termination of existence.’ All have a right to live, but they do not have a right to assert their beliefs on the rest of us and take over our culture and eventually in 50 years from now, have their perfect little ancient man-boy sex culture (obviously, this all was going to begin with HR 1681 or S 1770, ‘Every Child Deserves a Family Act). Again, we behave as a Christian nation (while still observing as many religious leaders, Christianity’s roots in Judaism- the father religion) and treat Homosexuals and gays who want this ultimate transformation, as ultimately and unfortunately people whose minds have been perverted- literally. In a straw hat survey university estimate, 90% of the gays reported being sexually molested (did the other 10% just forgot?).
They are victims.
This group knows nothing else than those behaviors inflicted upon themselves. Of course, as of my psychology background I know also- that in biology there are cases where ‘in-betweens’ can happen- naturally- as the case in my own textbook, where someone is born with both female and male genitalia. So we do not blame them for what they are, but take pity on them, while at the same time vigorously defending our culture from being dominated by the ancient Greek man-boy sex cultured world they want. This is difficult, as obviously all outlets of media- TV, movies, YouTube, internet, books, radio, major media outlets- are dominated by the propagation of a world that 50 years from now (or sooner) is exactly what they want- complete fulfillment of the perverse sexuality they want everywhere around. Only by producing equivalent and even greater amounts of media in all realms- to counter their efforts, can we succeed in knowing that our great grandchildren will be able to grow up in a truly moral world, as the founders of the Declaration of Independence intended. Yes, we allow them to be as they are; no, we do not allow them to dictate our USA culture to become perverse, and yes we take pity on them, too.
What do ‘Log Cabin Republicans’ have to say of Somerville Gay Republican Chairman Patrick J. Lott’s three year ‘hobby’ of videotaping male nude children in the shower of a Catholic middle school? By John P. Roco December 28, 2011 at 11:22 a.m. Hawaii Standard Time on Oahu, Hawaii
The ‘Log Cabin Republicans’ boast of being instrumental in removing ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ from the military. How boastful is this gay group, formed 30 years ago- for the sole purpose of advancing the gay agenda by infiltrating the GOP Republican party and representing itself as ‘gay republicans-‘ of the behavior of someone who all major newspapers conveniently omit as a ‘gay republican?’ The word ‘gay’ cannot, by some silent decree amongst the plethora of liberal news outlets, be associated with anybody who has done anything close to being wrong to any male children, adolescents, students or adoptees.
Omission of information begets a severe ‘twist’ on the story. This man was a volunteer at a Catholic middle school- that works. Spread the word that inappropriate tapings happened at a ‘Catholic’ school- great for publicity and sure to sell newspapers in this day and age. But for the sake of the Obama administration’s agenda of advancing the ‘Gay cause,’ and the recent victories of the ‘Gay agenda’ in outlawing Catholic Charities adoption and foster care in Illinois (2011), District of Columbia (2010), and Massachusetts (2006), do not let the ball stop rolling- ‘never mention any pertinent statistics on gays.’
Patrick J. Lott, a public middle school principal and ‘volunteer’ at the Catholic middle school is perfect- he fits the ticket perfectly. From the PreventChildAbuse.org PDF file on sex abuse of boys, “Sexual abusers of boys tend to be males who are known by the victim, but unrelated to the victim.” This ‘volunteer’ was perfect. He fit the statistics perfectly, a severe monstrosity of information intentionally suppressed for the sake of ‘political clout’ and ‘advancing agenda’ to the detriment of all male children, adolescents, students, adoptees, foster children, who will be future victims of these ‘respectful gays.’
Respectful- in achieving a position of authority and respect over children- while hiding the ulterior motive- obtaining nude pictures of these children. ‘In the closet’ gay behavior is much more dangerous than that which is forthright- and the ‘gay advancement’ movement is expert at infiltration for ulterior motive, whether it be the ‘Log Cabin Republicans’ towards the GOP Republican party, or this ‘volunteer’ Patrick J. Lott towards the blazingly lettered ‘Catholic Middle School’ he ‘altruistically’ joined. The Gay movement, just as Gay Republican Lott, is statistically the expert, savvy at acting out ‘in the closet.’
McQueary’s testimony on Sandusky, and Child Sexual Abuse and Molestation Gay Incidents
By John P. Roco, former foster family agency social worker, December 16, 2011
at 8:30 a.m. Hawaii Standard Time on Oahu, Hawaii
Sandusky’s ‘acting out’ is indicative of a statistically prevalent event concerning predatory behaviors of gay men who prey on boys, some ‘in the closet,’ while others ‘outright’ and in alignment with a lifestyle they promote as healthy. The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA, formed in 1978, but quit forming chapters in the late 1990s to avoid police infiltration), an association affiliated with poet Allen Ginsberg and Harry Hay, is probably ‘less dangerous’ due to being so forthright on views, than those gays who are ‘in the closet’ in their predatory behavior towards boys. The statistics are revealing:
From preventchildabuse.org is here is an excerpt from the PDF file on sexual abuse of boys:
“Who are the perpetrators?
Sexual abusers of boys tend to be males who are known by the victim, but unrelated to the victim. They tend to abuse the child outside the home, repeat the abuse, and involve some form of penetration. . . Threats of physical force or actual force are more common with male perpetrators and older victims” (p. 2).
What Mike McQueary described seeing in the football locker room showers of Penn State in 2002 between Jerry Sandusky and a young boy, is a type sexual abuse that though prevalent, is often unreported. Again from the PDF file on sexual abuse of boys:
“Silence about this type of abuse is very common. Many victims feel that they want to forget about the event, want to protect the perpetrator, and fear the reactions by those told about the abuse. Those who choose to disclose details of abuse may also find that few resources are available to provide support or few actions are taken…” (p. 2)
In effect, this McQueary testimony of Jerry Sandusky acting out behavior towards a specific boy victim, instead of being an anomaly, is an extremely predictable statistical event in terms of child abuse of boys. Gay men ‘in the closet’ over their preference for boys as sexual objects of choice, prey on these boys who they come to know through means the gay men ‘set up’ for their own self-gratification through powerful institutional buffering. Jerry Sandusky set up a non-profit to ‘help’ children. Frank Lombard an official of Duke University actually bragged to detectives of adopting a Black male child because they are easier to adopt, and of how easy it was to sexually abuse the child when younger and medicated.
And though the Catholic Church in 2005 set up seminary screening safeguards, that “men who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called ‘gay culture’ cannot be admitted to seminaries,” statistically speaking these sort of 'Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde' gay men institutionally exist, as recently Rev. Bartley Sorensen ironically also of Pennsylvania.
Eradication is difficult, as ‘cycle of abuse’ issues occur. A child molested by a gay man has an incident ‘ingrained in memory.’ And more often than not, the boy receives no mental health therapy. Thus, a child left to his own devices of ‘dealing with it’ may at one or several points in time, or on a repeated basis, play out the same situation, switching roles from victim to predator.
This dynamic is often not discussed in the public forum, but when I worked with juvenile sex offenders- fortunately caught early on in their predatory behavior, it was too cliché the disproportionately high numbers of gay offenders we had in the small treatment orientated incarceration facilities I worked in. This prevalent behavior ‘in the closet,’ must not be ignored. Jerry Sandusky’s behavior caught by Mike McQueary simply brings the statistical prevalence of these events forefront for all boy victims of gay men of ‘stature’ and ‘in the closet’ in sexual abuse.
Why the Catholic Church no longer allows ‘Gay Culture’ Priests
by John P. Roco December 12, 2011 12:00 a.m. Hawaii Standard Time
The 12/10/2011 Pennsylvania case of Rev. Bartley Sorensen being caught viewing nude images of prepubescent males in sexually elicit poses- was actually a statistically predictable event. He was caught by a church worker who participated in a program specifically geared towards identifying possible abuse. The worker notified the diocese who called the police for arrest.
The Catholic Church in 2005 (following 2004 results of the self-initiated John Jay Report on sexual abuse), as part of a comprehensive affront to sexual abuse, issued an edict that, “men who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called ‘gay culture’ cannot be admitted to seminaries.” Though screening prioritized, prior cases exist.
All abuse is terrible and need be terminated. Conjoint with this goal, the finding of the John Jay Report that 81% of victims were male, pointed a need to weed out those exhibiting behaviors as found in Pennsylvania. This process of finding any and all of those who lead ‘dual-lives’ of both a priest, and one deeply invested in ‘gay culture’ (sort of Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde’s) is difficult.
However, the very training that the Catholic Church is putting its employees through is getting the job done. The efficacious process by which the above case was arrested points to systematic protocols being dictated with adherence a must. Priests ‘in the closet’ as the gay terminology goes, must be found out that all abuse can be eradicated, inclusive of this so large a segment.
H.R.1681 & S.1770: “Catholic Charities- Dump Forever,” beats “Every Child Deserves a Family Act” by John P. Roco December 7, 2011 10:10 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time on Oahu
The name, “Every Child Deserves a Family Act,” implies there are children with no families. Further, every child, pertaining to those without a family, deserves a family. In terms of gay and lesbian foster and adoptive children and parents, many foster family and adoption agencies already ‘accept’ gay and lesbian couples and single parents. In fact, that is exactly what 2006 laws in Massachusetts, 2010 laws in the District of Columbia, and 2011 laws in Illinois took advantage of, the transfer of all cases of adoptions and foster care, from the recently outlawed Catholic Charities, to all of the other agencies that do accept gay and lesbian foster parents. Federal bill H.R. 1681 would do the same nationwide.
So what is the intent of H.R. 1681? It turns out this bill terminates the freedom of Catholics and non-Catholics, to choose Catholic Charities as stewards of their foster and adoptive children. So instead of, as implied by the name above, providing the families that every child deserves, H.R. 1681 or S. 1770 blatantly disenfranchises Catholics and non-Catholics who want to use Catholic Charities as stewards, thus terminating the loop. This also includes all those who want to place their children in Catholic Charities for adoption. So the net effect of this bill is exactly the opposite of what the name implies. This means of deceit, in naming the bill, has the net effect of destruction of public trust in lawmakers.
I therefore propose a new name, the “Catholic Charities- Dump Forever” bill. It could also be called the ‘CCDF’ bill, taking the place of the ‘ECDF’ designation used on Twitter. The ‘Catholic Charities- Dump Forever’ bill discriminates against all (Catholic or not) who want to use Catholic Charities, whether for adopting or becoming foster parents, or for giving up a child for adoption. The Catholic Church’s charitable work, though originating services in some regions of the nascent United States prior to state involvement, is now the target of the gay lobby. The ‘CCDF’ bill is the most unabashed expression yet of a new wielding of power, especially in lieu of all current White House directives targeting Catholics.
The Shared Realm: Sandusky-Joe Paterno-Penn State, the Catholic Church, and H.R. 1681 "Every Child Deserves a Family Act" by John Roco 11/16/2011 7:40 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time
The most unqualified failure in American culture is failure to recognize impending disaster. Examples such as, the housing crisis that lead to the economic downturn, or even 9/11 with warnings of terrorists learning to fly jet liners, figure in to our national persona, our Achilles heal.
The culture of the Catholic church in a prior day and age is so similar to what happened at Penn State, that Bishop Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, has offered Penn State or others institutional educational assistance due to the steep learning curve in such gaffes.
That is the good thing, here in America if something large occurs, we learn for a time. But a closer look at what occurred both in the Catholic Church, and Penn State, is warranted given the weightiness of the issues involved, that we truly learn and not have another such terrible mishap. Essentially, in Sandusky, we have a highly respected man who set out to help underpriviledged children- that is, on the outside. What he truly was doing, was stalking victims. In the Catholic Church, we had a situation where men who were attracted to children (81% of the victims being boys) become priests, entering into situations of trust in parishes and schools. These men (most of the perpetrators being 'gay' or homosexual) then 'took liberties' as did Sandusky. They abused positions of priviledge, honor, by appearing to be interested in the welfare of children- on the outside, while in truth and reality, just stalking victims.
What does this have to do with H.R. 1681, "Every Child Deserves a Family Act" 2011, you might ask? First a little background. Pete Stark (D-CA) introduced this bill into the federal House of Representatives, and it now has 81 co-sponsors (just under 1/5 of the House). On October 31, 2011, Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) introduced this bill into the senate. What this bill would do, is make it illegal to operate a foster family or adoption agency unless the agency is willing to accept homosexual, gay or lesbian couples. In essense this bill would shut down Catholic Charities foster care and adoptions nationwide, as has already happened in Massachusetts (2006), DC (2010), and Illinois (transfering away all cases as of Nov. 15, 2011). So, this bill would essentially force every foster care and adoption agency in the nation to be pervasively intertwined with gay and lesbian culture. What you have are couples who join an agency and are interviewed and have background checks, who eventually receive children in their care, and are paid for it.
The interviews usually last a couple hours at a time (I am a former foster family agency social worker), and it is a standard fingerprinting background check, with possibly a series of classes, then certification. It is actually in some ways much easier to become a foster parent, than to begin a nonprofit organization, as Sandusky did, given that you pass the background check. I wonder if Sandusky had any prior criminal record. Because as Sandusky, many who have figured into the field of 'helping the underpriviledged,' as foster and adoptive children are, may not at all be interested in beneficence.
At the top of this page, in 'yellow highlight' with 'green text' you will see a link to an article from a gay online magazine. Simply click the link, and you will find outright gay euphoria over the advantaged realm they will find themselves in- positions of exploitation of children 'in need-' as Sandusky did. And if you read the 'comments' section, there will be some rather blunt comments on the 'gay agenda-' which was not in any way 'welfare of the child.'
So what is the similarity between Penn State, the Catholic Church, and H.R. 1681? It is that gay cultured individuals approach into positions of power and trust- appearing to be 'saviors' for underpriviledged children, when in reality only looking for their own gain and benefit- whether money or lust.
Illinois- two views
Illinois Catholic Conference Creates Marriage-Defense Department
Advocates will defend God's definition of marriage in the wake of opposition.
10/02/2011 by KEVIN J. JONES (EWTN NEWS)
Illinois Catholic Conference Launches 'Defense Of Marriage' Department
First Posted: 9/29/11 01:43 PM ET Updated: 9/29/11 02:17 PM ET Huffington Post Chicago
Religious Liberty vs. Civil Unions
